Seitenpfad:

31.08.2009 LOO­ME: Lang­zeit-Ob­ser­va­to­ri­um ge­star­tet

Ein Me­than aus­sto­ßen­der Schlamm­vul­kan un­ter Be­ob­ach­tung
 
LOOME
Long-term Observatory On Mud-volcano Eruptions

A demonstration mission to establish a long term observatory on a methane emitting deep-sea mud volcano.

LOOME coordinator:
Dirk de Beer, +49 421 2028 802 or dbeer@mpi-bre­men.de
Max-Planck-In­sti­tu­te for Ma­ri­ne Mi­cro­bio­lo­gy, Cel­si­us­stras­se 1, 28359 Bre­men, Ger­ma­ny

Principal Investigators and their institutions
In­sti­tu­ti­onPrin­ci­pal In­ves­ti­ga­torAd­dress
Max Planck In­sti­tu­te for Ma­ri­ne Mi­cro­bio­lo­gy
(KDM part­ner)
Dirk de BeerCel­si­us­stras­se 1, D-28359 Bre­men
dbeer@mpi-bre­men.de
Tel. 0421 2028– 802
Fax: 0421 2028- 690
Ger­ma­ny
MA­RUM
(KDM part­ner)
Chris­toph Wald­mannLeo­be­ner Str.
D-28359 Bre­men
wald­mann@uni-bre­men.de
Tel. 0421 218 – 65606
Fax: 0421 218 – 65605
Ger­ma­ny
AWI
(KDM part­ner)
Mi­cha­el Schlu­e­terAm Han­dels­ha­fen 12,
27570 Bre­mer­ha­ven, Ger­ma­ny
mschlu­e­ter@awi-bre­mer­ha­ven.de
Tel .+49 471 4831 1840
Fax:+49 471 4831 1425
Ger­ma­ny
IfM Geo­mar (KDM part­ner)Tho­mas Fe­se­kerWisch­hof­str. 1-3, 24148 Kiel, Ger­ma­ny
tfe­se­ker@ifm-geo­mar.de
Tel. +49 431 6002321
Fax: +49 431 6002916
Ger­ma­ny
If­re­merJean Paul Fou­cherTech­no­po­le de Brest-Iroi­se
BP 70
29280 PLOU­ZA­NE, Fran­ce
jean.paul.fou­cher@if­re­mer.fr
Tel: +33 (0)2 98 22 40 40
FAX: +33 (0)2 98 22 40 45
Fran­ce
UiTJu­er­gen Mie­nertDrams­vei­en 201
N-9037 Trom­sø, Nor­way
ju­er­gen.mie­nert@ig.uit.no
Te­le­pho­ne: (+47) 77 64 44 46
Fax: (+47) 77 64 56 00
Nor­way



Introduction
LOO­ME DM is a net­wor­king ac­tion for the long-term ob­ser­va­ti­on of a ma­jor site of me­tha­ne emis­si­on from the deep Eu­ro­pean mar­gin, the Hå­kon Mos­by mud vol­ca­no (HMMV). The HMMV is a cold seep eco­sys­tem lo­ca­ted at a wa­ter depth of 1250 m on the SW Ba­rents Sea slo­pe off Nor­way, in an area with a his­to­ry of se­abed sli­des and tsu­na­mis, and un­der ex­ploi­ta­ti­on for hy­dro­c­ar­bon re­sour­ces and fis­he­ries. The Ba­rents Sea slo­pe is a tar­get area for sustainable ma­nage­ment and mo­ni­to­ring of glo­bal chan­ge ef­fects. Pre­vious work of the part­ners at HMMV yiel­ded evi­dence of se­veral erup­ti­ve events, in­di­ca­ted by strong gas ebul­li­ti­on and ab­rupt tem­pe­ra­tu­re chan­ges of al­most 10°C wi­t­hin a few days. High-re­so­lu­ti­on ba­thy­metric maps and vi­deo ob­ser­va­tions of the seaf­loor be­fo­re and af­ter this event cle­ar­ly show­ed chan­ges in the mor­pho­lo­gy of HMMV. Only by de­tai­led con­ti­nuous ob­ser­va­tions, re­cor­ding a wide va­rie­ty of pa­ra­me­ters, we can learn about the me­cha­nics of such erup­ti­ons and their ear­ly si­gnals, esti­ma­te the amount of gas re­leased and the con­se­quen­ces for
geo­che­mis­try and lo­cal com­mu­nities as well as for seaf­loor sta­bi­li­ty, which are main sci­en­ti­fic ob­jec­tives.
Fur­ther­mo­re, me­tha­ne is a power­ful green­hou­se gas and the­re­fo­re the glo­bal bud­ge­ting of sour­ces and sinks is of gre­at im­port­an­ce. Se­ar­ches for ma­ri­ne sour­ces of me­tha­ne are fo­cu­sed on deep-sea see­page through mud vol­ca­noes and gas hy­dra­te be­a­ring se­di­ments. It is thought that in the­se are­as most me­tha­ne trans­por­ted towards the oxic bio­s­phe­re is re­mo­ved by an­ae­ro­bic me­tha­ne oxi­da­ti­on cou­p­led to sul­fa­te re­duc­tion (1-3, 5, 6). The ef­fi­ci­en­cy of me­tha­ne trans­port and oxi­da­ti­on in the seaf­loor are, howe­ver, still po­or­ly cons­trai­ned due to lack of un­der­stan­ding of the con­trol­ling fac­tors. Spe­cial con­di­ti­ons, for ex­amp­le by high pore wa­ter flow or gas ebul­li­ti­on by ex­ces­si­ve me­tha­ne ac­cu­mu­la­ti­on, enable the me­tha­ne to es­cape up through the sul­fa­te bar­ri­er (4).
Microbathymetric map from 2003. (Source: IFREMER) The volcano is surrounded by a slight depression.

Ecology and transport
Li­que­fied mud, gas, and ge­of­luids ri­sing from a depth of at least three ki­lo­me­ters, form a high­ly ac­tive mud vol­ca­no wi­th­per­ma­nent gas emis­si­on. The Haa­kon Mos­by is ca 1200 m in dia­me­ter, has max 10 m height and con­sists of se­veral more or less con­centric ha­bi­tats. It is a site of uni­que che­mo­a­u­tro­phi­cal­ly dri­ven fau­nal and mi­cro­bi­al com­mu­nities, fu­el­led by the oxi­da­ti­on of me­tha­ne by sul­fa­te and fur­ther oxy­da­ti­on of sul­fi­de by oxy­gen and ni­tra­te. An ou­ter hum­mo­cky area of ca 300 m width is shaped by gas hy­dra­tes, and co­ve­r­ed with Po­go­no­pho­ra worms. Gray bac­te­ri­al mats oc­cur above high­ly gas­sy se­di­ment patches whe­re hy­dra­tes have ero­ded. Fur­ther towards the cen­ter one finds lar­ge mats of Beggia­toa, lar­ge fil­amen­tous bac­te­ria that oxi­di­se sul­fi­de with oxy­gen or ni­tra­te. The cen­ter is flat and con­sists of gray mud. Here the hig­hest flow ve­lo­ci­ties oc­cur, that gra­dual­ly de­crea­se out­wards, and are pro­bab­ly clo­se to zero in the hy­dra­te zone. This eco­lo­gi­cal struc­tu­re can be un­ders­tood from the dif­fe­ren­ces in po­re­wa­ter see­page(2).
The hig­her flow ve­lo­ci­ties in the cen­ter are re­flec­ted in the hig­her sur­face tem­pe­ra­tu­res, and more spe­ci­fi­cal­ly, in stee­per near sur­face tem­pe­ra­tu­re gra­di­ents. A de­tai­led stu­dy using tem­pe­ra­tu­re pro­bes, show­ed that the stee­pest gra­di­ents, and thus the hig­hest upf­low ve­lo­ci­ties, are pre­sent in an area of ca 80 m in dia­me­ter near the north side of the cen­tral area, cha­rac­te­ri­zed by high­ly dis­tur­bed, gas sa­tu­ra­ted se­di­ments (Fig. Hot spot area).
Microbathymetric map from 2006 (Source IFREMER), with a 10 times higher resolution. The hot center is indicated with a red circle. The X indicates the position of the graviticorer with attached temperature probes.
We ob­tai­ned evi­dence from a year long tem­pe­ra­tu­re re­cord, that the HMMV is not in a con­ti­nuous­ly se­eping vent. In De­cem­ber 2005 and April 2006 dras­tic tem­pe­ra­tu­re chan­ges were ob­ser­ved, oc­cur­ring in one day. The­se spec­ta­cu­lar pheno­me­na show that the cen­ter of the HMMV is ac­tive and has ir­re­gu­lar erup­ti­ons. The dis­tur­ban­ce cau­sed by the­se erup­ti­ons will af­fect bio­geo­che­mis­try and lo­cal fau­na. Thus the eco­lo­gi­cal zo­nes can be un­ders­tood from a steady sta­te mo­del and from tem­po­ral lo­cal per­tur­ba­ti­ons. To as­sess which pheno­me­na are the do­mi­nant shaping fac­tors is fa­sci­na­ting from fun­da­men­tal sci­en­ti­fic point of view.
The site forms thus a na­tu­ral la­bo­ra­to­ry for eco­lo­gists and geo­lo­gists. It was selec­ted to be in­clu­ded in the Nor­we­gi­an Mar­gin ca­ble net­work. The HMMV is a prio­ri­ty tar­get wi­t­hin the ESO­NET/​EMSO pro­ject, and a key site of the EU pro­jects HER­MES/​HER­MIO­NE, MAR­BEF as well as the ESF Eu­ro­De­ep pro­gram CHE­ME­CO.

The observatory
We pro­po­sed LOO­ME as de­mons­tra­ti­on mis­si­on wi­t­hin ESO­NET, to de­ploy a long term ob­ser­va­to­ry with a lar­ge va­rie­ty of sen­sors to pre­pa­re for a node con­nec­ted mea­su­ring sys­tem. In 2008 we were gran­ted k€300 as en­cou­ra­ging sup­port for this plan, to­ta­ling k€1300. The sci­en­ti­fic aims of LOO­ME are to do­cu­ment phy­si­co-che­mi­cal pheno­me­na be­fo­re, du­ring and af­ter an erup­ti­on, and to stu­dy its ef­fects on gas hy­dra­te sta­bi­li­ty, seaf­loor mor­pho­lo­gy, geo­che­mis­try and the dis­tri­bu­ti­on and co­lo­niza­t­i­on pat­terns of bent­hic com­mu­nities.. The tech­no­lo­gi­cal aims are to in­te­gra­te many sen­sors and to de­fi­ne best pa­ra­me­ters for fur­ther long term ob­ser­va­ti­on of mud vol­ca­nism, to op­ti­mi­ze in­te­gra­ted ways of un­der­wa­ter data sto­r­a­ge and re­trie­val, and to de­ve­lop tech­no­lo­gy for wake up calls.

We ai­med for a com­bi­na­ti­on of sen­sors that mea­su­re pheno­me­na deep into the vol­ca­no, at the sur­face and in the wa­ter co­lumn. Mo­re­o­ver, as the sys­tem must be au­to­no­mous, the boun­da­ry con­di­ti­ons for the choice of sen­sors were de­ter­mi­ned by data sto­r­a­ge and power con­sump­ti­on. Most es­sen­ti­al is that a pos­si­ble erup­ti­on would not re­sult in data loss, the­re­fo­re all data mea­su­red at the erup­ti­on site will be stored in the frame of the LOO­ME ob­ser­va­to­ry on a safe ad­ja­cent lo­ca­ti­on 15 m away from the hot spot

First Installations in 2008
In au­tumn 2008 the first au­to­no­mous moo­rings were de­ploy­ed by a joint mis­si­on of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Trom­so and IF­RE­MER with RV Jan May­en (Nor­way). The moo­rings in­clu­ded an OBS sys­tem, a tem­pe­ra­tu­re lan­ce and a pie­zo­me­ter. The­se moo­rings were re­co­ve­r­ed du­ring our re­cent ex­pe­di­ti­on with PO­LAR­STERN (ARK XXIV-2, 10.07.09 – 04.07.09) and re­de­ploy­ed
The frame of LOO­ME is con­struc­ted of light weight non-cor­ro­si­ve and fle­xi­ble ma­te­ri­als. It can be re­co­ve­r­ed au­to­no­mous­ly or by ROV. Sum­ma­ri­zing the LOO­ME ob­ser­va­to­ry mea­su­ring from depth to wa­ter­co­lumn:
The sen­sors mea­su­ring in depth are a Oce­an Bot­tom Seis­mo­me­ter (OBS), a 8 m pie­zo­me­ter, and a T-lan­ce of 13 m. 1) The OBS mea­su­res acoustics from the seaf­loor. The sounds from the seaf­loor are cor­rec­ted with the sounds from the wa­ter co­lumn to ob­tain a cle­ar image of the geo­sounds in­di­ca­ting seis­mic ac­tivi­ty of the mud vol­ca­no. The data should give an ear­ly warning of an erup­ti­ve event. 2) The pie­zo­me­ter mea­su­res subt­le chan­ges in po­re­wa­ter pres­su­re, thus in­di­ca­ti­ve for chan­ged po­re­wa­ter flow. 3) The T-lan­ce will mea­su­re chan­ges in the tem­pe­ra­tu­re pro­fi­le, in­du­ced by chan­ged po­re­wa­ter mo­ve­ment.
At the seaf­loor we will mea­su­re with a se­ries of che­mo­sen­sors and T-strings across the hot spot, and a 1 m T-lan­ce in the midd­le of the hot spot. 1) The che­mo­sen­sors are 6 units each mea­su­ring pH, DO and ORP. We hope to de­tect in­crea­sed up­ward flow of the aci­dic, an­oxic and low ORP po­re­wa­ter. 2) The T-string in­clu­des 24 ther­mo­me­ters, laid out across the hot spot. With the­se strings we hope to ob­tain a pic­tu­re on the dy­na­mics of sur­face pheno­me­na.


In the wa­ter co­lumn we mea­su­re with three CTDs (con­duc­tivi­ty, T, sal­in­i­ty, tur­bi­di­ty) moun­ted at the bot­tom, midd­le and top of the frame of LOO­ME, and a scan­ning so­nar. 1) With the two CTDs we hope to de­tect the ver­ti­cal extent of the ef­fect of the seis­mic ac­tivi­ty of the ac­tive site. 2) With the so­nar we will de­tect gas fla­res up to a dis­tan­ce of 300 m, and can quan­ti­fy the emis­si­ons to a dis­tan­ce of 50 m. The power con­sump­ti­on of the so­nar and the data sto­r­a­ge ca­pa­ci­ties do not al­low the so­nar to ope­ra­te at suf­fi­ci­ent in­ten­si­ty du­ring 1 year, thus the so­nar will switch on and off au­to­ma­ti­cal­ly.
As a first step towards the in­te­gra­ti­on of the­se va­rious sen­sors into an ob­ser­va­to­ry, some of them are con­nec­ted to a CO­S­TOF (Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on and Sto­r­a­ge Front-end), a low-power con­sump­ti­on mo­du­lar elec­tro­nic unit that pro­vi­des the fol­lo­wing ser­vices: syn­chro­niza­t­i­on of the mea­su­re­ment data with a com­mon clock, lo­cal du­pli­ca­ti­on of some sen­sor data and a com­mon ac­cess chan­nel to all con­nec­ted sen­sors via a CLSI (Con­tact-Less Se­ri­al In­ter­face) al­lo­wing the in­stal­ling ROV to fine-tune and check the func­tio­n­ing of the sen­sors on the se­abed. First, the CO­S­TOF was plan­ned to be used to trig­ger the ac­tiva­ti­on of the so­nar for 24 hours when an erup­ti­on is pre­dic­ted. This is done by run­ning an al­go­rithm that ana­ly­ses the T-lan­ce data as and when ac­qui­red, to pre­dict the oc­cur­rence of an erup­ti­on. The pre­dic­tion al­go­rithm was de­ve­l­o­ped on the base of past tem­pe­ra­tu­re data se­ries ana­ly­sis. Un­for­t­u­n­a­te­ly, the so­nar cras­hed, could be re­pai­red, but can no lon­ger com­mu­ni­ca­te with CO­S­TOF, and is now pro­gram­med to re­cord au­to­no­mous­ly 23 scans every 12 hours. We ex­pect still in­te­res­ting data.
Fi­nal­ly, 10 m away from the LOO­ME frame we po­si­tio­ned an au­to­no­mous ca­me­ra that will at re­gu­lar in­ter­vals ta­kes vi­deo streams of gas bub­b­le emis­si­ons from the fresh mud flow and the lo­cal fau­na brow­sing bac­te­ri­al mats.




 
LOOME just before deployment, left panel, Backside with central data storage, CLSI (funnel) and Costof, right photo: front side with T and chemosensor strings, sonar and CTD. The white blocks are flotation material.
Deployment and recovery
De­ploy­ment took place du­ring the ARK-XXIV/​2 FS Po­lar­stern crui­se (crui­se lea­der M. Kla­ges) in July 2009 using the ROV QUES­T4000 of MA­RUM. LOO­ME was lo­we­r­ed to the seaf­loor by winch, and ac­cu­ra­te­ly po­si­tio­ned by the ROV Quest af­ter the re­lease of its de­ploy­ment weights. We had cho­sen a sta­ble se­di­men­ta­ry en­vi­ron­ment ca. 20 m away from the hot­spot con­fir­med ear­lier by on­line T lan­ce mea­su­re­ments from the ship. The ROV then po­si­tio­ned the sen­sors across the area of in­te­rest (Fig. sen­sor ca­bles LOO­ME), from the tem­pe­ra­tu­re hot­spot towards the edge of the most re­cent mud flow (clo­se to the geo­gra­phic cen­ter). Via CSLI the func­tio­n­ing of CO­S­TOF, the T-sen­sors and the ca­me­ra AIM was re­cor­ded and fi­nal pro­gram op­ti­miza­t­i­ons were made. The de­ploy­ment was a com­plex ope­ra­ti­on that went ful­ly ac­cor­ding to plan. The CSLI was also used to op­ti­mal­ly po­si­ti­on the ca­me­ra, which has been pla­ced fa­c­ing a bub­b­le stream and ab­un­dant fau­na (Fig. If­re­mer ca­me­ra). Also the­re first tem­pe­ra­tu­re data were ob­tai­ned. Re­co­very of LOO­ME, OBS and the T-lan­ce will oc­cur in au­tumn 2010, by a crui­se with the FS Me­ri­an. The de­ploy­ment of the long P- and T-lan­ces was done by winch, and re­co­very was ai­ded by the ROV, to hook on the ships winch.

On the Ha­kon Mos­by we en­coun­te­red the RV Jan May­en, with our LOO­ME part­ner Jür­gen Mie­nert as chief sci­en­tist, who re­co­ve­r­ed and re­de­ploy­ed the oce­an bot­tom seis­mo­me­ter (OBS). The OBS was re­de­ploy­ed at the ide­al po­si­ti­on, at the edge of the most ac­tive area.
Fotos of deployment, UW photos of LOOME made by ROV Quest, MARUM (Bremen, Germany).
Further literature:

1. Boe­ti­us, A., K. Ra­ven­schlag, C. Schu­bert, D. Ri­ckert, F. Wid­del, A. Gie­se­ke, R. Amann, B. B. Jør­gen­sen, U. Wit­te, and O. Pfann­ku­che. 2000. A ma­ri­ne mi­cro­bi­al con­sor­ti­um ap­pa­r­ent­ly me­dia­ting an­ae­ro­bic oxi­da­ti­on of me­tha­ne. Na­tu­re 407:623-626.
2. de Beer, D., E. Sau­ter, H. Nie­mann, N. Kaul, J. P. Fou­cher, U. Wit­te, M. Schlü­ter, and A. Boe­ti­us. 2006. In situ flu­xes and zo­na­ti­on of mi­cro­bi­al ac­tivi­ty in sur­face se­di­ments of the Hå­kon Mos­by Mud Vol­ca­no. Lim­nol. Ocea­no­gr. 51:1315-1331.
3. El­vert, M., E. C. Hop­mans, T. Treu­de, A. Boe­ti­us, and E. Su­ess. 2005. Spa­ti­al va­ria­ti­ons of me­tha­notro­phic con­sor­tia at cold me­tha­ne seeps: im­n­pli­ca­ti­ons from a high-re­so­lu­ti­on mole­cu­lar and iso­to­pic ap­proach. Geo­bio­lo­gy 3:195-209.
4. Mar­tens, C. S., and J. V. Klump. 1980. Bio­geo­che­mi­cal cy­cling in an or­ga­nic-rich co­as­tal ma­ri­ne ba­sin. I. Me­tha­ne se­di­ment-wa­ter ex­ch­an­ge pro­ces­ses. Geoch.Cos­moc.Acta 44:471-490.
5. Mi­chae­lis, W., R. Sei­fert, K. Nau­haus, T. Treu­de, V. Thiel, M. Blu­men­berg, K. Knit­tel, A. Gie­se­ke, K. Pe­ter­knecht, T. Pape, A. Boe­ti­us, R. Amann, B. B. Jør­gen­sen, F. Wid­del, J. Peck­mann, N. V. Pi­me­nov, and M. B. Gu­lin. 2002. Mi­cro­bi­al reefs in the Black Sea fu­e­led by an­ae­ro­bic oxi­da­ti­on of me­tha­ne. Sci­ence 297:1013-1015.
6. Treu­de, T., M. Krü­ger, A. Boe­ti­us, and B. B. Jør­gen­sen. 2005. En­vi­ron­men­tal con­trol on an­ae­ro­bic oxi­da­ti­on of me­tha­ne in the gas­sy se­di­ments of Ecken­fo­er­de Bay (Ger­man Bal­tic). Lim­nol. Ocea­no­gr. 50:1771-1786.
7. Blan­din, J., and J.F. Ro­lin. 2005.An Ar­ray of Sen­sors for the Se­abed Mo­ni­to­ring of Ge­o­ha­zards, a Ver­sa­ti­le So­lu­ti­on for the Long -Term Real-Time Mo­ni­to­ring of Dis­tri­bu­ted Se­abed Pa­ra­me­ters. Sea Tech­no­lo­gy, Vo­lu­me 46, No. 12.
8. Blan­din J., A. Van­gries­heim, J. Le­grand, J.Y. Coa­il, B. Leil­dé. 2007. Real time trans­mis­si­on of cur­rent and tur­bi­di­ty data from the near bot­tom Var can­yon sys­tem. Mar­tech 2007 Se­cond In­ter­na­tio­nal Work­shop on Ma­ri­ne Tech­no­lo­gy pro­cee­dings.


Loome crew members on the Polarstern
Dirk de Beer, Je­ro­me Blan­din, Ant­je Boe­ti­us, To­mas Fe­se­ker, Jean Paul Fou­cher, Ju­li­en Le­Grand, Jür­gen Mie­nert, Fran­cois Har­meg­nies, Ka­ri­ne Olu, Vol­ker Rat­mey­er, Vi­ta­li Schkel, Marc Vieh­we­ger, Chris­toph Wald­mann, Frank Wenz­hoefer, Gero Wet­zel
 
Back to Top