Page path:

Sym­bi­oses from hy­dro­thermal vents and cold seeps

 
 

Deep-sea hy­dro­thermal vents and cold seeps are col­on­ized by dense com­munit­ies of an­im­als host­ing chemo­syn­thetic sym­bi­otic bac­teria that provide them with nu­tri­tion. These sym­bionts use geo­fuels such as meth­ane, re­duced sul­fur com­pounds and hy­dro­gen, emit­ted from the sea floor at vents and seeps, as an en­ergy source to fix in­or­ganic car­bon or meth­ane into bio­mass. The es­tab­lish­ment of sym­bi­oses with chemo­syn­thetic bac­teria as primary pro­du­cers is the evol­u­tion­ary in­nov­a­tion that al­lowed in­ver­teb­rate an­im­als to thrive in these ex­treme hab­it­ats where the in­put of or­ganic mat­ter from pho­to­syn­thesis is ex­tremely low.

Bathymodiolus mussels

Mussel icon by M. Franke based on photo by M. Ücker

Ifremeria snail

Snail icon by M. Franke based on photo by M. Ücker

Rimicaris shrimp

Rimicaris icon by M. Ücker based on photo from P. Briand, Ifremere (http://www.marinespecies.org/deepsea/photogallery.php?album=3715&pic=64127)
 
 
 
 

Sym­bi­oses in Ba­thymo­di­olus mus­sels

Distribution of our Bathymodiolus samples worldwide

Bathymodiolus mus­sels are wide­spread throughout the world’s oceans. They oc­cur at hy­dro­thermal vents and cold seeps where they are one of the most dom­in­ant an­im­als and grow to large abund­ances and bio­mass. Their suc­cess in these hab­it­ats is fa­cil­it­ated by be­ne­fi­cial sym­bi­otic bac­teria that are hos­ted within spe­cial­ized gill cells called bac­teri­o­cytes. These sym­bionts can turn chem­ical en­ergy from hy­dro­thermal flu­ids into bio­mass to feed their mus­sel hosts. Through such chemo­syn­thetic pro­cesses, the mus­sels are in­de­pend­ent of sur­face-de­rived food sources. Bathymodiolus mus­sels live a in sym­bi­osis with sul­fur-ox­id­iz­ing sym­bionts, that can use re­duced sul­fur com­pounds or hy­dro­gen as en­ergy source, and/​or meth­ane-ox­id­iz­ing sym­bionts that thrive on meth­ane.Our re­search aims to un­der­stand the evol­u­tion­ary his­tory, de­vel­op­ment and host-sym­biont in­ter­ac­tion of these sym­bi­oses.

 

Overview - symbiosis in Bathymodiolus mussels.

We com­bine a vari­ety of tech­niques (e.g. meta­ge­n­om­ics, tran­scrip­tom­ics, meta­bolo­m­ics, lipidom­ics) that al­low us to in­vest­ig­ate Bathymodiolus sym­bi­oses from a global geo­graphic dis­tri­bu­tion down to a fine-scale res­ol­u­tion that can visu­al­ize spa­tial pat­terns within single hosts (e.g. FISH, TEM, MALDI). Over the years, we dis­covered more com­plex Bathymodiolus sym­bi­oses with a higher sym­biont di­versity. For ex­ample, we re­cently found a high di­versity at strain-level in the sul­fur-ox­id­iz­ing sym­bionts. Apart from the well-stud­ied be­ne­fi­cial sym­bionts, Bathymodiolus mus­sels as­so­ci­ate with a range of bac­teria whose role in the sym­bi­osis is less clear, such as Ca. En­do­nuc­leo­bac­ter, which in­fects the nuc­lei of mus­sels cells. We also re­cently iden­ti­fied spir­o­chaetes in mus­sels from the Ker­ma­dec Arc with com­pletely un­known func­tions.The sym­bionts of Bathymodiolus mus­sels are thought to be ho­ri­zont­ally trans­mit­ted, which means they are taken up from the en­vir­on­ment with each new host gen­er­a­tion. This mode of ac­quis­i­tion opens up many new ques­tions that we are in­vest­ig­at­ing – such as How do host and symbionts recognize each other? How long is the time window for symbiont acquisition? Is there an active free-living stage of the symbionts? What makes them different from their free-living relatives?

 
 

Over­view of pro­jects & people

Pop­u­la­tion ge­net­ics of ba­thymo­di­olin mus­sels of the Mid-At­lantic Ridge - Karina van der Heijden

Pop­u­la­tion ge­n­om­ics of mus­sels at the Mid-At­lantic Ridge & mus­sel sym­bi­oses world­wide - Christian Borowski

Pop­u­la­tion ge­n­om­ics of the Bathymodiolus sym­bi­osis, sym­bionts in Bathymodiolus hy­brids & free-liv­ing stage of sym­bionts - Merle Ücker

De­vel­op­ment of Bathymodiolus mus­sels, sym­biont col­on­iz­a­tion and  trophic re­la­tion between lar­vae and adults - Maximilian Franke

Bathymodiolus ul­tra­struc­ture - Niko Leisch

Spa­tial meta­bolo­m­ics and cor­rel­at­ive 3D his­to­logy - Benedikt Geier

Lipidom­ics in Bathymodiolus mus­sels - Dolma Michellod

Physiolo­gical re­sponse of Bathymodiolus hosts and sym­bionts to stress as re­vealed by tran­scrip­tom­ics (and pro­teo­m­ics) - Målin Tietjen

Mi­cro­scopy, phylo­geny and mo­lecu­lar bio­logy of Endonucleobacter & SOX strain mo­sa­icism in Bathymodiolus azoricus - Miguel Ángel González-Porras

Strain di­versity and evol­u­tion in en­dosym­bionts of Bathymodiolus mus­sels & gen­ome struc­ture in the bac­terial SUP05 clade - Rebecca Ansorge

Meta­bolic in­vest­ig­a­tion of cul­tiv­able sym­biont re­l­at­ives - Patric Bourceau

 

Pop­u­la­tion ge­net­ics of Ba­thymo­di­olus at the Mid-At­lantic Ridge

Mussels at 5°S (Lilliput vent site). Image: GEOMAR (Kiel)

K. van der Heijden, C. Borowski

The aim of this study is to shed light on the evol­u­tion­ary his­tory of Bathymodiolus mus­sels at the Mid-At­lantic Ridge. Previous phylogenetic analyses of the mussels showed that the clas­sical marker gene for phylo­gen­etic as­sess­ment, the mi­to­chon­drial mt­COI, does not provide enough res­ol­u­tion to cla­rify the re­la­tion­ship within this group.
To in­vest­ig­ate the geo­graphic struc­ture, gene gene­a­lo­gies, and the ma­jor dir­ec­tions and re­l­at­ive amounts of his­tor­ical gene flow between the four mus­sel pop­u­la­tions at the Mid-At­lantic Ridge, we are us­ing a multi-locus ap­proach for this pop­u­la­tion ge­netic study. The res­ults of our ana­lyses are used to re­con­struct the evol­u­tion­ary his­tory of the mus­sel pop­u­la­tions which also provides us with in­sight on the col­on­iz­a­tion his­tory of the Mid-At­lantic Ridge.

Sym­bionts in a mus­sel hy­brid zone

Hybrids at the MAR

M. Ücker

In the Bathymodiolus sym­bi­osis, little is known about the in­flu­ence of the sym­bionts on the evol­u­tion of the host des­pite many stud­ies that have been per­formed on the sym­bionts‘ physiology. Our study aims to un­der­stand the pop­u­la­tion struc­ture and dy­nam­ics of Bathymodiolus mus­sels and the role of sym­bi­oses in an­imal hy­brid­isa­tion. We ana­lyse mus­sel samples from a vent field at the Mid-At­lantic Ridge where two mus­sel spe­cies, B. azoricus and B. puteoserpentis, have been de­scribed to form vi­able hy­brids. We use dia­gnostic mark­ers and meta­ge­n­omic tech­niques to as­sess the hy­brid status of each mus­sel in­di­vidual and to in­vest­ig­ate the phylo­geny of host mi­to­chon­dria and the sym­bionts. We hope to shed new light on the sym­bi­osis in hy­brid Bathymodiolus mus­sels and in­vest­ig­ate ques­tions of sym­biont spe­cificity and re­cog­ni­tion. Un­der­stand­ing hy­brid­isa­tion in sym­bi­otic an­im­als al­lows us to study spe­cies form­a­tion and evol­u­tion in nat­ural com­munit­ies and the role of bac­terial sym­bionts in these pro­cesses.

De­vel­op­ment of Ba­thymo­di­olus mus­sels & sym­biont col­on­iz­a­tion

Baby bathys

M. Franke, N. Leisch

Adult Bathymodiolus mus­sels har­bour their primary sym­bionts in the gill tis­sue. In ju­ven­ile mus­sels however, the sym­bionts col­on­ize not only the gills but also all other epi­thelial tis­sues within the mantle cav­ity. Only little is known about how and when sym­bionts first col­on­ize the mus­sels. To un­der­stand the pro­cesses and pref­er­ences of sym­biont col­on­iz­a­tion, we ex­am­ine early de­vel­op­mental stages of Bathymodiolus mus­sels. Us­ing a cor­rel­at­ive ima­ging ap­proach, which unites light- and elec­tron mi­cro­scopy with syn­chro­tron ra­di­ation-based X-ray mi­cro tomo­graphy, we are able to gen­er­ate a de­tailed three-di­men­sional mor­pho­lo­gical data­set. This data­set can be com­bined with sym­biont loc­al­iz­a­tion us­ing 16S rRNA FISH and al­lows us to de­term­ine the time of sym­biont col­on­iz­a­tion re­vealed by dis­tinct mor­pho­lo­gical ad­apt­a­tions dur­ing the de­vel­op­ment of the host. Our work serves as a start­ing point for fur­ther func­tional ana­lyses to elu­cid­ate how bac­teria can in­flu­ence and shape early eu­k­a­ryotic de­vel­op­ment.

Spa­tial meta­bolo­m­ics and cor­rel­at­ive 3D his­to­logy

Desy

B. Geier, M. Franke, E. So­gin, D. Michel­lod, M. Á. Gón­za­lez-Por­ras, A. Gruhl, N. Leisch, M. Liebeke

En­dosym­bi­oses such as in Bathymodiolus mus­sels are char­ac­ter­ized by in­tim­ate meta­bolic in­ter­ac­tions among the sym­bi­otic part­ners. Yet, we know very little about the nature of these in­ter­ac­tions in sym­bi­oses, par­tic­u­larly in their en­vir­on­mental con­text. There­fore, we cre­ated a spa­tial meta­bolo­m­ics pipeline (metaFISH) that links sym­biont gen­o­types with meta­bolic phen­o­types to al­low a spa­tial as­sign­ment of host and sym­biont meta­bol­ites at the scale of in­di­vidual host cells. We could ob­serve how the spa­tial chem­istry of host cells dif­fers with the pres­ence of in­tra­cel­lu­lar sym­bionts, found vari­ations in meta­bolic phen­o­types in a single sym­biont type and de­tec­ted novel meta­bol­ites. To gain a broader un­der­stand­ing of meta­bol­ite dis­tri­bu­tion at the scale of whole an­im­als, we also de­veloped a cor­rel­at­ive work­flow that al­lows ima­ging the 3D ana­tomy and mo­lecu­lar com­pos­i­tion of an­imal-mi­crobe sys­tems. The high spa­tial res­ol­u­tion gained be these ima­ging ap­proaches al­lows us to tackle some of the fun­da­mental ques­tion in sym­bi­osis re­search such as how do the sym­bi­otic part­ners in­ter­act.

Physiolo­gical re­ponse of Ba­thymo­di­olus sym­bi­osis to en­vir­on­mental change

Idefix sampling device

M. Tietjen

To un­der­stand the cel­lu­lar in­ter­ac­tions between Bathymodiolus mus­sels and their in­tra­cel­lu­lar sym­bionts, we make use of ad­vanced next-gen­er­a­tion se­quen­cing tech­niques and in­vest­ig­ate gene ex­pres­sion pat­terns of both part­ners. In par­tic­u­lar, we are in­vest­ig­at­ing which gene (groups) are re­spons­ible for the main­ten­ance of the sym­bi­osis in the light of chan­ging en­vir­on­mental con­di­tions. One ex­ample for such con­di­tions is the lim­ited ac­cess to hy­dro­thermal flu­ids that carry es­sen­tial en­ergy sources for the sym­bionts such as sul­fur or meth­ane. Such vary­ing con­di­tions are ex­pec­ted to oc­cur reg­u­larly in hy­dro­thermal sys­tems. We sim­u­late such con­di­tions with in situ and labor­at­ory ex­per­i­ments, and com­pare the physiolo­gical re­sponses of both host and sym­bionts on the tran­scrip­tome and pro­teome level.

Mi­cro­scopy, phylo­geny and mo­lecu­lar bio­logy of En­do­nuc­leo­bac­ter

FISH image of Bathymodiolus mussel infected with Ca. Endonucleobacter (yellow).

M. Á. Gónzalez-Porras, N. Leisch

Ca. En­do­nuc­leo­bac­ter is a gammapro­teo­bac­terial para­site that in­fects the nuc­lei of Bathymodiolus mus­sels. After a single Ca. En­do­nuc­leo­bac­ter cell in­vades the host nuc­leus, it pro­lif­er­ates massively (up to 80,000 bac­teria per nuc­leus) and the volume of the nuc­leus in­creases up to 50 fold. We in­vest­ig­ate how Ca. En­do­nuc­leo­bac­ter thrives in the nuc­leus, how it af­fects host cells and how it pre­vents the shut­down of the eu­k­a­ryotic cell (e.g. ap­op­tosis). To do so, we have se­quenced the gen­ome of the para­site and coupled laser cap­ture mi­cro­dissec­tion of in­fec­ted nuc­lei with ul­tra-low-in­put RNA-se­quen­cing. We are now in­vest­ig­at­ing how the tran­scrip­tional pro­files of para­site and host change along the in­fec­tious cycle. By tar­get­ing the tran­scrip­tomic pro­files of spe­cific life stages of an in­tra­nuc­lear para­site in situ, our pipeline closes the gap between the visual, mo­lecu­lar and tem­poral char­ac­ter­iz­a­tion of a para­site-host in­ter­ac­tion.

Strain di­versity of Ba­thymo­di­olus sym­bionts

Strain diversity in Bathymodiolus mussels

R. Ansorge, M. Á. Gón­za­lez-Por­ras

Bey­ond spe­cies bound­ar­ies, small ge­n­omic changes can strongly im­pact the life­style of a bac­terial strain. However, cur­rently it is not well un­der­stood how strain-level di­versity in sym­bi­oses emerges, per­sists and if or how it im­pacts mu­tu­al­istic as­so­ci­ations. We de­veloped a meta­ge­n­om­ics ap­proach to tease apart strain-level differences in Bathymodiolus symbionts and dis­covered strik­ing func­tional dif­fer­ences among co-oc­cur­ring sym­biont strains. This high res­ol­u­tion al­lows us to study sym­biont pop­u­la­tion struc­ture that helps us un­der­stand sym­biont col­on­iz­a­tion dy­nam­ics. Us­ing cul­tiv­a­tion-in­de­pend­ent meth­ods our re­search provides a snap­shot of the sym­bi­osis in its nat­ural con­text, al­low­ing us to in­vest­ig­ate how such strain di­versity evolved, per­sists and how it com­pares to free-liv­ing re­l­at­ives of the sym­bionts.

Meta­bolic in­vest­ig­a­tion of cul­tiv­able sym­biont re­l­at­ives

Cultivation experiments in the lab. Image: P. Bourceau

P. Bourceau

Over the last years, our omic ap­proaches have given us in­sights into the in­tric­ate re­la­tion­ship and meta­bolic in­ter­ac­tion between the Bathymodiolus hosts and their sym­bionts. To fully show that par­tic­u­lar pro­cesses take place, we ap­ply ma­nip­u­lat­ive ex­per­i­ments with sym­biont re­l­at­ives such as Methyloprofundus sedimenti, as cul­tur­ing Bathymodiolus sym­bionts re­mains chal­len­ging. By us­ing con­trolled in­cub­a­tion ex­per­i­ments and mass-spec­tro­metry based ana­lyses of the meta­bolome, we can meas­ure traits of the M. sedimenti gen­ome that are shared with the meth­ane-ox­id­ising sym­biont of Bathymodiolus mus­sels. Not only can we identify pos­sible sub­strates but also ex­creted meta­bol­ites, which could po­ten­tially be avail­able to the host. Our over­all aim is to char­ac­ter­ize meta­bolic mark­ers linked to en­vir­on­mental con­di­tions to con­clude the re­cent his­tory of a spe­ci­men from the deep-sea with meta­bolo­m­ics data.

On­go­ing col­lab­or­a­tions with former mem­bers of the de­part­ment

Anne Kup­czok, Re­becca An­sorge, Ad­rien As­sié, Ant­ony Chakkiath, Lizbeth Sayavedra, Maxim Ru­bin-Blum

Ex­ternal col­lab­or­at­ors

Deep-sea re­search in the field

 
 

Sym­bi­oses in deep-sea snail Ifre­meria

One of the most abund­ant an­im­als at hy­dro­thermal vent sys­tems of the West­ern Pa­cific is the snail Ifremeria nautilei. These hosts har­bor at least 4 bac­terial sym­bionts in their gills, sulf­ide- and meth­ane-ox­id­iz­ing gammapro­teo­bac­teria and at least 2 al­phapro­teo­bac­terial phylo­types of un­known func­tion. We are cur­rently us­ing com­par­at­ive se­quence ana­lysis of phylo­gen­etic and func­tional genes to gain a bet­ter un­der­stand­ing of these sym­bi­oses (Borowski et al. in prep.).

 
 

Sym­bi­osis in deep-sea shrimp Rimi­caris

Rimicaris shrimp
Image: P. Briand, IFREMER
Rimicaris shrimp on a hydrothermal chimney
Image: IFREMER

Rimicaris shrimp form gi­ant swarms on hy­dro­thermal vent chim­neys in the At­lantic and In­dian oceans. They host a dense com­munity of chemo­syn­thetic epi­bionts in their mod­i­fied gill cham­ber. The epi­bi­osis is dom­in­ated by fil­a­ment­ous gamma- and ep­si­lon­pro­teo­bac­teria. Al­though the epi­bionts are as­sumed to con­trib­ute to the shrimp's nu­tri­tion, dir­ect evid­ence for this is still lack­ing. We showed that epibionts on R. exoculata from Mid-Atlantic Ridge vents have distinct biogeographic distribution patterns. We are cur­rently in­vest­ig­at­ing epi­biont biogeo­graphy on R. hybisae from two vents in the Mid-Cay­man Spread­ing Cen­ter, which are only 20 km apart but are sep­ar­ated by 2.5 km wa­ter depth. The shrimp epi­bionts have a free-liv­ing stage dur­ing their life cycle, and these free-liv­ing sym­bionts are abund­ant at the vent sites col­on­ized by Rimicaris. We will com­pare the biogeo­graphy of the free-liv­ing and host-as­so­ci­ated sym­bionts to an­swer the ques­tion: Is everything everywhere and the partners select?

Back to Top